Difference between revisions of "My current thoughts on the technical AI safety pipeline (outside academia)"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [[Nobody understands what makes people snap into AI safety]] | * [[Nobody understands what makes people snap into AI safety]] | ||
* [[Generic advice is difficult to give but also important]] | * [[Generic advice is difficult to give but also important]] | ||
+ | * [[Newcomers in AI safety are silent about their struggles]] | ||
Appendix: | Appendix: |
Revision as of 23:24, 18 May 2020
- There is room for something like RAISE
- AI safety technical pipeline does not teach how to start having novel thoughts
- AI safety is not a community
- Mixed messaging regarding independent thinking
- There is pressure to rush into a technical agenda
- AI safety lacks a space to ask stupid or ballsy questions
- AI safety is harder than most things
- Nobody understands what makes people snap into AI safety
- Generic advice is difficult to give but also important
- Newcomers in AI safety are silent about their struggles
Appendix: