Difference between revisions of "My current thoughts on the technical AI safety pipeline (outside academia)"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* [[Newcomers in AI safety are silent about their struggles]] | * [[Newcomers in AI safety are silent about their struggles]] | ||
* [[It is difficult to find people to bounce ideas off of]] | * [[It is difficult to find people to bounce ideas off of]] | ||
| + | * [[It is difficult to get feedback on published work]] | ||
Appendix: | Appendix: | ||
Revision as of 00:16, 19 May 2020
- There is room for something like RAISE
- AI safety technical pipeline does not teach how to start having novel thoughts
- AI safety is not a community
- Mixed messaging regarding independent thinking
- There is pressure to rush into a technical agenda
- AI safety lacks a space to ask stupid or ballsy questions
- AI safety is harder than most things
- Nobody understands what makes people snap into AI safety
- Generic advice is difficult to give but also important
- Newcomers in AI safety are silent about their struggles
- It is difficult to find people to bounce ideas off of
- It is difficult to get feedback on published work
Appendix:
