List of success criteria for HRAD work

From Issawiki
Revision as of 02:14, 2 June 2020 by Issa (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is a list of success criteria that have been proposed for HRAD work. Most of these are correlated, so this isn't anything like a list of independent ways HRAD could succeed. The idea is to list out more concrete ways in which HRAD work will be useful.

  • resembles the work of Turing, Shannon, Bayes, etc
  • helps AGI programmers avoid mistakes analogous to the use of null-terminated strings in C
  • early advanced AI systems will be understandable in terms of HRAD's formalisms [1] (need to clarify what it means to be understandable in terms of a formalism)
  • helps AGI programmers fix problems in early advanced AI systems
  • helps AGI programmers predict problems in early advanced AI systems
  • helps AGI programmers postdict/explain problems in early advanced AI systems
  • ideas from HRAD will be a "useful source of inspiration" for ML/AGI work [2]
  • when applying HRAD to actual systems, there will be "theoretically satisfying approximation methods" that make this application possible [3]
  • when applying HRAD to actual systems, the approximation methods used will preserve the important desirable properties of HRAD work [4]

See also