Difference between revisions of "List of breakthroughs plausibly needed for AGI"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
see https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/5WECpYABCT62TJrhY/will-ai-undergo-discontinuous-progress#The_Conceptual_Arguments | see https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/5WECpYABCT62TJrhY/will-ai-undergo-discontinuous-progress#The_Conceptual_Arguments | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <references/> | ||
[[Category:AI safety]] | [[Category:AI safety]] | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 21 May 2020
- Looking at things like The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences and Judea Pearl's work on causality and trying to estimate how many insights are required to build an AGI.[1]
