Difference between revisions of "List of breakthroughs plausibly needed for AGI"
(Created page with "* Looking at things like ''The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences'' and Judea Pearl's work on causality and trying to estimate how many insights are required to build...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Looking at things like ''The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences'' and Judea Pearl's work on causality and trying to estimate how many insights are required to build an AGI.<ref name="jane-street-debate">https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk</ref> | * Looking at things like ''The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences'' and Judea Pearl's work on causality and trying to estimate how many insights are required to build an AGI.<ref name="jane-street-debate">https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | see https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/5WECpYABCT62TJrhY/will-ai-undergo-discontinuous-progress#The_Conceptual_Arguments | ||
[[Category:AI safety]] | [[Category:AI safety]] | ||
Revision as of 21:55, 21 May 2020
- Looking at things like The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences and Judea Pearl's work on causality and trying to estimate how many insights are required to build an AGI.[1]
