Difference between revisions of "Flag things to fix during review"
(Created page with "one thing i do while doing my daily reviews: if i come across some incongruity or question while reviewing a card, i write down the question on the paper in front of me (i alw...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | one thing i do while doing my daily reviews: if i come across some incongruity or question while reviewing a card, i write down the question on the paper in front of me (i always have a scratch paper in front of me for e.g. writing kanji or expressions for math) and then i circle it (to distinguish it from scratch work). | + | one thing i do while doing my daily reviews: if i come across some incongruity or question while reviewing a card, i write down the question on the paper in front of me (i always have a scratch paper in front of me for e.g. writing kanji or expressions for math) and then i circle it (to distinguish it from scratch work). Sometimes when I'm reviewing, seeing a card makes my mind wander in a certain new direction, and that can lead to new questions. |
then, after finishing my daily reviews, i go back to each question and i make new cards about them. | then, after finishing my daily reviews, i go back to each question and i make new cards about them. | ||
e.g. today i was reviewing the definition of C\_f(x) in algorithmic complexity (Li and Vitanyi), and i only had a couple of cards about this, and since it had been a while, i realized i didn't even know what x was! This sort of thing is hard to anticipate. So i wrote (on paper) a question asking what x was, and looked it up in the book, and added the same question as a new anki note. | e.g. today i was reviewing the definition of C\_f(x) in algorithmic complexity (Li and Vitanyi), and i only had a couple of cards about this, and since it had been a while, i realized i didn't even know what x was! This sort of thing is hard to anticipate. So i wrote (on paper) a question asking what x was, and looked it up in the book, and added the same question as a new anki note. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Use paper during spaced repetition reviews]] | ||
[[Category:Spaced repetition]] | [[Category:Spaced repetition]] | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 16 May 2020
one thing i do while doing my daily reviews: if i come across some incongruity or question while reviewing a card, i write down the question on the paper in front of me (i always have a scratch paper in front of me for e.g. writing kanji or expressions for math) and then i circle it (to distinguish it from scratch work). Sometimes when I'm reviewing, seeing a card makes my mind wander in a certain new direction, and that can lead to new questions.
then, after finishing my daily reviews, i go back to each question and i make new cards about them.
e.g. today i was reviewing the definition of C\_f(x) in algorithmic complexity (Li and Vitanyi), and i only had a couple of cards about this, and since it had been a while, i realized i didn't even know what x was! This sort of thing is hard to anticipate. So i wrote (on paper) a question asking what x was, and looked it up in the book, and added the same question as a new anki note.
