Difference between revisions of "AI safety field consensus"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
one operationalization might be something like: what are the things relevant to AI safety that all of [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]], [[Paul Christiano]], [[Robin Hanson]], [[Rohin Shah]], [[Dario Amodei]], and [[Wei Dai]] agree on? | one operationalization might be something like: what are the things relevant to AI safety that all of [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]], [[Paul Christiano]], [[Robin Hanson]], [[Rohin Shah]], [[Dario Amodei]], and [[Wei Dai]] agree on? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:AI safety]] | ||
Revision as of 03:57, 26 April 2020
People in AI safety tend to disagree about many things. However, there is also wide agreement about some other things (which people outside the field often disagree about).
- Orthogonality thesis
- Instrumental convergence
- Edge instantiation
- Patch resistance
- Goodhart problems i.e. awareness that Goodhart's law is a thing, and general attention/wariness of it
- AGI possible in principle (as in, it is virtually certain that humans can create AGI)
- advanced AI will have a huge impact on the world
see also "Background AI safety intuitions" section in [1]
one operationalization might be something like: what are the things relevant to AI safety that all of Eliezer Yudkowsky, Paul Christiano, Robin Hanson, Rohin Shah, Dario Amodei, and Wei Dai agree on?
