AlphaGo and its successor AlphaGo Zero are used to make various points in AI safety.
| Date |
Initial segment + link |
Description
|
| 2016-02-08 |
I have one bet on at 2:3 against AlphaGo winning against Sedol in March - they get my $667 if AlphaGo wins, I get their $1000 if AlphaGo loses |
|
| 2016-02-29 |
This suggests that AlphaGo beating Sedol in March might not be nearly as out-of-character fast progress as I thought |
|
| 2016-03-09 |
Second match ongoing. #AlphaGo just made a move that everyone is saying nobody else would have played. #Sedol walked out of the room with his clock running, presumably to think about it.
|
| 2016-03-10 |
It's possible that, contrary to hopeful commentators, #AlphaGo is not actually enriching the Go game for humans |
|
| 2016-03-11 |
(Long.) As I post this, AlphaGo seems almost sure to win the third game and the match. |
|
| 2016-03-13 |
And then AlphaGo got confused in a way no human would and lost its 4th game |
|
| 2016-03-13 |
Okay, look, to everyone going "Aha but of course superhuman cognition will always be bugged for deep reason blah": Please remember that machine chess *is* out of the phase where a human can analyze it psychologically without computer assistance |
|
| 2017-10-19 |
AlphaGo Zero uses 4 TPUs, is built entirely out of neural nets with no handcrafted features, doesn't pretrain against expert games or anything else human, reaches a superhuman level after 3 days of self-play, and is the strongest version of AlphaGo yet |
|
