Difference between revisions of "AI safety field consensus"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Goodhart problems | * Goodhart problems | ||
* AGI possible in principle (as in, it is virtually certain that humans can create AGI) | * AGI possible in principle (as in, it is virtually certain that humans can create AGI) | ||
| + | |||
| + | see also "Background AI safety intuitions" section in [https://agentfoundations.org/item?id=1129] | ||
one operationalization might be something like: what are the things relevant to AI safety that all of [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]], [[Paul Christiano]], [[Robin Hanson]], [[Rohin Shah]], [[Dario Amodei]], and [[Wei Dai]] agree on? | one operationalization might be something like: what are the things relevant to AI safety that all of [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]], [[Paul Christiano]], [[Robin Hanson]], [[Rohin Shah]], [[Dario Amodei]], and [[Wei Dai]] agree on? | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 25 February 2020
People in AI safety tend to disagree about many things. However, there is also wide agreement about some other things (which people outside the field often disagree about).
- Orthogonality thesis
- Instrumental convergence
- Edge instantiation / patch resistance
- Goodhart problems
- AGI possible in principle (as in, it is virtually certain that humans can create AGI)
see also "Background AI safety intuitions" section in [1]
one operationalization might be something like: what are the things relevant to AI safety that all of Eliezer Yudkowsky, Paul Christiano, Robin Hanson, Rohin Shah, Dario Amodei, and Wei Dai agree on?
