Difference between revisions of "Explanation science"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* [[We still don't know how to systematically write great word explanations]] | * [[We still don't know how to systematically write great word explanations]] | ||
* [[Word explanations are already great]] | * [[Word explanations are already great]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==What links here== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Special:WhatLinksHere/{{FULLPAGENAME}} | hideredirects=1}} | ||
[[Category:Learning]] | [[Category:Learning]] | ||
Revision as of 00:39, 17 July 2021
Explanation science is a phrase that keeps entering my verbal loop. I think there is a science of writing great explanations.
I think this page (which is written by me, admittedly) is a really good example of the kind of thing I am trying to point at with the phrase "explanation science": https://learning.subwiki.org/wiki/Examples_in_mathematics It examines the idea of "examples" closely and comes up with a typology, in such a way that someone who is writing an expository piece in math can use it to make sure they have all four kinds of examples.
See also
- We still don't know how to systematically write great word explanations
- Word explanations are already great
