Difference between revisions of "Comparison of AI takeoff scenarios"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| [[Daniel Kokotajlo]] || Yes || Yes || Yes | | [[Daniel Kokotajlo]] || Yes || Yes || Yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Hansonian]] slow takeoff || Yes || No || No | + | | [[Hansonian]] slow takeoff || Yes || No?<ref>In some places Hanson says things like "You may recall that I did not dispute that an AI based economy would grow faster than does our economy today. The issue is the relative rate of growth of one AI system, across a broad range of tasks, relative to the entire rest of the world at that time." [https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10155848910529228?comment_id=10155848990064228&reply_comment_id=10155849018834228] This sounds more like Paul's takeoff scenario. I'm not clear on how the Paul and Hanson scenarios differ.</ref> || No |
|- | |- | ||
| [[Eric Drexler]]'s CAIS || Yes || No? I think he says something weird, like all of the AI systems together recursively self-improving at the all-AI-services-combined level, without a single agent-like AI that self-improves. || No? | | [[Eric Drexler]]'s CAIS || Yes || No? I think he says something weird, like all of the AI systems together recursively self-improving at the all-AI-services-combined level, without a single agent-like AI that self-improves. || No? | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 01:01, 23 February 2020
Scenario | Significant changes to the world prior to critical AI capability threshold being reached? | Intelligence explosion? | Decisive strategic advantage? / Unipolar outcome? |
---|---|---|---|
Yudkowskian hard takeoff | No | Yes | Yes |
Paul's slow takeoff | Yes | Yes | No |
Daniel Kokotajlo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Hansonian slow takeoff | Yes | No?[1] | No |
Eric Drexler's CAIS | Yes | No? I think he says something weird, like all of the AI systems together recursively self-improving at the all-AI-services-combined level, without a single agent-like AI that self-improves. | No? |
- ↑ In some places Hanson says things like "You may recall that I did not dispute that an AI based economy would grow faster than does our economy today. The issue is the relative rate of growth of one AI system, across a broad range of tasks, relative to the entire rest of the world at that time." [1] This sounds more like Paul's takeoff scenario. I'm not clear on how the Paul and Hanson scenarios differ.