Difference between revisions of "Coherence and goal-directed agency discussion"
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/TE5nJ882s5dCMkBB8/conclusion-to-the-sequence-on-value-learning | https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/TE5nJ882s5dCMkBB8/conclusion-to-the-sequence-on-value-learning | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==See also== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Comparison of terms related to agency]] | ||
+ | * [[List of terms used to describe the intelligence of an agent]] |
Revision as of 22:36, 1 March 2020
One of the "big discussions" that has been taking place in AI safety in 2018 and 2019 is about coherence arguments and goal-directed agency. Some of the topics in this discussion are:
- What point was Eliezer trying to make when bringing up coherence arguments?
- Will the first AGI systems we build be goal-directed?
- Are utility maximizers goal-directed?
- What are the differences and implication structure among intelligence, goal-directedness, expected utility maximizer, coherent?
https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/9zpT9dikrrebdq3Jf/will-humans-build-goal-directed-agents
https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/tHxXdAn8Yuiy9y2pZ/ai-safety-without-goal-directed-behavior
https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/TE5nJ882s5dCMkBB8/conclusion-to-the-sequence-on-value-learning