Difference between revisions of "Comparison of pedagogical scenes"

Revision as of 12:35, 7 February 2022

Name	Medium	Gets to deep stuff?^{[note 1]}	Focus on explanation vs creating/doing?	Focus on analyzing explanations?	Totally new stuff, or just "do more of the same, but faster and with more polish"?
Generic pedagogy, say "good" math books like Tao, Axler, Spivak	Text	Yes (but it's very difficult work!)	Explanation	No	same old
Tools for thought	The point is to create new mediums!	Yes?	Creating/doing	Yes	Totally new stuff!
Research distillation^[1]	Mostly text, with some interactive widgets	Kinda (aspirational, but most online essays are still not so deep)	Explanation	No, or at least not in public	faster/more polish
Explorable explanations	Interactive widgets	Not really	Explanation	No	mix of both
3Blue1Brown	Non-interactive video with visualizations	No	Explanation	No	mix of both
Khan Academy	Tutor-like videos and text	Explanation	Kinda, but it only targets "easy" topics	No	just cover all the high school topics
Explanation science	Mostly text?	Yes (aspirational)	Explanation	Yes	Totally new stuff!

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {| class="sortable wikitable"
 |-
-! Name !! Medium !! Gets to deep stuff?<ref class=note>a</ref> !! Focus on explanation vs creating/doing? !! Focus on analyzing explanations? || Totally new stuff, or just "do more of the same, but faster and with more polish"?
+! Name !! Medium !! Gets to deep stuff?<ref group=note>a</ref> !! Focus on explanation vs creating/doing? !! Focus on analyzing explanations? || Totally new stuff, or just "do more of the same, but faster and with more polish"?
 |-
 | Generic pedagogy, say "good" math books like Tao, Axler, Spivak || Text || Yes (but it's very difficult work!) || Explanation || No || same old
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 <references/>
+==Notes==
+<references group=note/>
 [[Category:Learning]]