Difference between revisions of "Missing gear vs secret sauce"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I want to distinguish between the following two framings: | I want to distinguish between the following two framings: | ||
| − | * missing gear/[[one wrong number problem]]: "missing gear" doesn't imply that the last piece added is all that significant -- it just says that adding it caused a huge jump in capabilities. | + | * missing gear/[[one wrong number problem]]/understanding is discontinuous: "missing gear" doesn't imply that the last piece added is all that significant -- it just says that adding it caused a huge jump in capabilities. |
* [[secret sauce for intelligence]]/small number of breakthroughs: "small number of breakthroughs" says that the last added piece must have been a significant piece (which is what a breakthrough is). | * [[secret sauce for intelligence]]/small number of breakthroughs: "small number of breakthroughs" says that the last added piece must have been a significant piece (which is what a breakthrough is). | ||
Revision as of 07:14, 3 June 2020
I want to distinguish between the following two framings:
- missing gear/one wrong number problem/understanding is discontinuous: "missing gear" doesn't imply that the last piece added is all that significant -- it just says that adding it caused a huge jump in capabilities.
- secret sauce for intelligence/small number of breakthroughs: "small number of breakthroughs" says that the last added piece must have been a significant piece (which is what a breakthrough is).
I'm not sure how different these two actually are. But when thinking about discontinuities, I've noticed that I am somewhat inconsistent about conflating these two and distinctly visualizing them.
