Difference between revisions of "Choosing problems for spaced proof review"
(→See also) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Spaced proof review]] takes a lot of effort to implement even if done correctly. One of the mistakes one can make is to choose problems which aren't worth solving over and over. | + | [[Spaced proof review]] takes a lot of effort to implement even if done correctly. One of the mistakes one can make is to choose problems which aren't worth solving over and over. (By "problems", I mean math problems, i.e. the exercise or theorem statement or whatever.) |
Properties of good problems: | Properties of good problems: | ||
Revision as of 23:51, 15 May 2020
Spaced proof review takes a lot of effort to implement even if done correctly. One of the mistakes one can make is to choose problems which aren't worth solving over and over. (By "problems", I mean math problems, i.e. the exercise or theorem statement or whatever.)
Properties of good problems:
- The problem is easy
- The problem is "fun"
- The problem is fundamental/important
Easy/fun problems are good for helping you build up and keeping the habit of spaced proof review.
Properties of bad problems:
- There's a lot of fiddly details that are challenging to get right on the spot.
- Problems which give you a sense of dread or some sort of "ugh" reaction.
