Difference between revisions of "Minimal AGI vs task AGI"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** to a three-step view: build a [[minimal aligned AGI]], then task AGI, then Sovereign | ** to a three-step view: build a [[minimal aligned AGI]], then task AGI, then Sovereign | ||
* I'm not sure why "three" is the right number of phases (why not two or four?), and I don't think MIRI has explained this | * I'm not sure why "three" is the right number of phases (why not two or four?), and I don't think MIRI has explained this | ||
+ | |||
+ | see my question here: https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/hL9ennoEfJXMj7r2D/two-clarifications-about-strategic-background#comment-yNGuxf4Gs27wW72Jp | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 06:48, 25 February 2020
- I'm not clear on what the difference is here
- See MIRI's strategic plan from end of 2017[1] where they make this distinction
- It seems like MIRI went from:
- a one-step view: just build a Sovereign
- to a two-step view: build a task-directed AGI first, then go for Sovereign
- to a three-step view: build a minimal aligned AGI, then task AGI, then Sovereign
- I'm not sure why "three" is the right number of phases (why not two or four?), and I don't think MIRI has explained this
see my question here: https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/hL9ennoEfJXMj7r2D/two-clarifications-about-strategic-background#comment-yNGuxf4Gs27wW72Jp