Difference between revisions of "Textbook test for AI theory"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Textbook test/paper test: so my question for [[Robin Hanson]] is, once you have a complete theory of AI, how many pages of text does it take to describe that theory in sufficient detail that a team of human programmers can build the AI in less than a year (i.e. not including any of the data that the AI will use to learn from)? | Textbook test/paper test: so my question for [[Robin Hanson]] is, once you have a complete theory of AI, how many pages of text does it take to describe that theory in sufficient detail that a team of human programmers can build the AI in less than a year (i.e. not including any of the data that the AI will use to learn from)? | ||
− | I feel like [[Eliezer]] would say it fits in a couple of pages, and Hanson would say it's going to require many books (possibly thousands) to store all the insights. | + | I feel like [[Eliezer]] would say it fits in a couple of pages, and [[Hanson]] would say it's going to require many books (possibly thousands) to store all the insights. |
[[Category:AI safety]] | [[Category:AI safety]] |
Latest revision as of 23:32, 18 June 2021
Textbook test/paper test: so my question for Robin Hanson is, once you have a complete theory of AI, how many pages of text does it take to describe that theory in sufficient detail that a team of human programmers can build the AI in less than a year (i.e. not including any of the data that the AI will use to learn from)?
I feel like Eliezer would say it fits in a couple of pages, and Hanson would say it's going to require many books (possibly thousands) to store all the insights.