Difference between revisions of "Science argument"
(Created page with "The '''science argument''' says that science is this general "architectural insight" which allowed humans to have much more control over the world, and that w...") |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | In debates about [[AI takeoff]], the '''science argument''' is an argument for [[Secret sauce for intelligence|expecting a small number of breakthroughs for AGI]], which in turn supports a [[hard takeoff]]. The argument states that the scientific method is a general "[[Architecture|architectural]] insight" which allowed humans to suddenly have much more control over the world, and that we should expect something like that to happen with AI as well: that there is some sort of core insight that allows an AI to suddenly have much more control over the world, rather than gaining capability through a bunch of incremental progress. [https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk] (search "you look at human civilization and there's this core trick called science") See (5) in [http://www.overcomingbias.com/2011/07/debating-yudkowsky.html] for [[Robin Hanson]]'s response. | |
| + | |||
| + | ==History== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The first instance of the argument found so far is by [[Eliezer Yudkowsky]] during the Jane Street debate with [[Robin Hanson]] (2011). | ||
[[Category:AI safety]] | [[Category:AI safety]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:09, 15 June 2021
In debates about AI takeoff, the science argument is an argument for expecting a small number of breakthroughs for AGI, which in turn supports a hard takeoff. The argument states that the scientific method is a general "architectural insight" which allowed humans to suddenly have much more control over the world, and that we should expect something like that to happen with AI as well: that there is some sort of core insight that allows an AI to suddenly have much more control over the world, rather than gaining capability through a bunch of incremental progress. [1] (search "you look at human civilization and there's this core trick called science") See (5) in [2] for Robin Hanson's response.
History
The first instance of the argument found so far is by Eliezer Yudkowsky during the Jane Street debate with Robin Hanson (2011).
