Difference between revisions of "Representing impossibilities"
(Created page with "if you want to do a proof by contradiction, you somehow have to visually represent impossible situations! ==See also== * Explorable explanation * Finiteness assumption...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | in math, you often deal with impossible situations (such as within a proof by contradiction). How do you reliably represent these impossibilities within the [[explorable explanation]]s framework? | ||
| + | |||
if you want to do a proof by contradiction, you somehow have to visually represent impossible situations! | if you want to do a proof by contradiction, you somehow have to visually represent impossible situations! | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | |||
* [[Finiteness assumption in explorable media]] | * [[Finiteness assumption in explorable media]] | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 2 March 2021
in math, you often deal with impossible situations (such as within a proof by contradiction). How do you reliably represent these impossibilities within the explorable explanations framework?
if you want to do a proof by contradiction, you somehow have to visually represent impossible situations!
