Difference between revisions of "Missing gear vs secret sauce"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm not sure how different these two actually are. But when thinking about discontinuities, I've noticed that I am somewhat inconsistent about conflating these two and distinctly visualizing them. | I'm not sure how different these two actually are. But when thinking about discontinuities, I've noticed that I am somewhat inconsistent about conflating these two and distinctly visualizing them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="sortable wikitable" | ||
| + | ! Term !! Definition | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Missing gear || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Secret sauce || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | One wrong number function || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Step function || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Understanding is discontinuous || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Payoff thresholds || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |} | ||
[[Category:AI safety]] | [[Category:AI safety]] | ||
Revision as of 04:51, 9 June 2020
I want to distinguish between the following two framings:
- missing gear/one wrong number problem/step function/understanding is discontinuous/payoff thresholds: "missing gear" doesn't imply that the last piece added is all that significant -- it just says that adding it caused a huge jump in capabilities.
- secret sauce for intelligence/small number of breakthroughs: "small number of breakthroughs" says that the last added piece must have been a significant piece (which is what a breakthrough is).
I'm not sure how different these two actually are. But when thinking about discontinuities, I've noticed that I am somewhat inconsistent about conflating these two and distinctly visualizing them.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Missing gear | |
| Secret sauce | |
| One wrong number function | |
| Step function | |
| Understanding is discontinuous | |
| Payoff thresholds | |