Difference between revisions of "There is room for something like RAISE"
(Created page with "Self-studying all of the technical prerequisites for technical AI safety research is hard. The most that people new to the field get are a list of textbooks. I think there...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Self-studying all of the technical prerequisites for [[technical AI safety research]] is hard. The most that people new to the field get are a list of textbooks. I think there is room for something like what [[RAISE]] was trying to become: some sort of community/detailed resource/support structure/etc for people studying this stuff. | Self-studying all of the technical prerequisites for [[technical AI safety research]] is hard. The most that people new to the field get are a list of textbooks. I think there is room for something like what [[RAISE]] was trying to become: some sort of community/detailed resource/support structure/etc for people studying this stuff. | ||
| + | Here are some more concrete ideas: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Detailed solutions for all of the prerequisite math books, e.g. for the ones listed at [https://intelligence.org/research-guide/]. I've started on one example of this at [https://taoanalysis.wordpress.com/] (though I'm doing that for other reasons as well). | ||
[[Category:AI safety meta]] | [[Category:AI safety meta]] | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 18 May 2020
Self-studying all of the technical prerequisites for technical AI safety research is hard. The most that people new to the field get are a list of textbooks. I think there is room for something like what RAISE was trying to become: some sort of community/detailed resource/support structure/etc for people studying this stuff.
Here are some more concrete ideas:
