Snoozing epicycle - Revision history

Issa at 18:19, 18 July 2021

2021-07-18T18:19:14Z

Issa at 20:21, 29 November 2020

2020-11-29T20:21:03Z

Issa at 20:20, 29 November 2020

2020-11-29T20:20:27Z

Issa at 20:19, 29 November 2020

2020-11-29T20:19:26Z

Issa at 20:14, 29 November 2020

2020-11-29T20:14:48Z

Issa at 20:08, 29 November 2020

2020-11-29T20:08:41Z

Issa: Created page with "When reviewing in my spaced writing inbox, sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is..."

2020-11-29T20:05:04Z

Created page with "When reviewing in my spaced writing inbox, sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is..."

New page

When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? i feel like the "rules of the game" haven't been established yet so it is hard to say what I should do ... i.e. idk how to convert my mental motions (like flinch, or excitement, or tiredness) into a piece or parameter of the algorithm for the scheduling algorithm.

[[Category:Spaced repetition]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 18 July 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* [[Mapping mental motions to parts of a spaced repetition algorithm]]		* [[Mapping mental motions to parts of a spaced repetition algorithm]]
		+
		+	==What links here==
		+
		+	{{Special:WhatLinksHere/{{FULLPAGENAME}} \| hideredirs=1}}

	[[Category:Spaced repetition]]		[[Category:Spaced repetition]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? Spaced repetition was supposed to be a [[soft alarm clock]] that could gently push back items into the future, but if I can't deal with items when they show up for review, that is adding another "epicycle": I am wanting to hit snooze on the snooze itself.
-The way to make this more interesting is to imagine that I had an item in my inbox that's already been there for a while. It comes up for review. If I hit "good", then it's going to next come back in 5 years. That feels like too much time! (another way to explain this feeling: if I had been less busy on that week, I totally would have reviewed this item; it's only because of X, Y, and Z being higher priorities that I don't have the mental energy to do this review.) So I want to hit "snooze" on the review itself -- remind me about ''the fact that this item is due for review'' in, say, a week.
+The way to make this more interesting is to imagine that I had an item in my inbox that's already been there for a while. It comes up for review. If I hit "good", then it's going to next come back in 5 years. That feels like too much time! (another way to explain this feeling: [[Busy life periods and spaced inbox|if I had been less busy on that week, I totally would have reviewed this item]]; it's only because of X, Y, and Z being higher priorities that I don't have the mental energy to do this review.) So I want to hit "snooze" on the review itself -- remind me about ''the fact that this item is due for review'' in, say, a week.
 ==See also==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? Spaced repetition was supposed to be a [[soft alarm clock]] that could gently push back items into the future, but if I can't deal with items when they show up for review, that is adding another "epicycle": I am wanting to hit snooze on the snooze itself.
-The way to make this more interesting is to imagine that I had an item in my inbox that's already been there for a while. It comes up for review. If I hit "good", then it's going to next come back in 5 years. That feels like too much time! So I want to hit "snooze" on the review itself -- remind me about ''the fact that this item is due for review'' in, say, a week.
+The way to make this more interesting is to imagine that I had an item in my inbox that's already been there for a while. It comes up for review. If I hit "good", then it's going to next come back in 5 years. That feels like too much time! (another way to explain this feeling: if I had been less busy on that week, I totally would have reviewed this item; it's only because of X, Y, and Z being higher priorities that I don't have the mental energy to do this review.) So I want to hit "snooze" on the review itself -- remind me about ''the fact that this item is due for review'' in, say, a week.
 ==See also==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 29 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? Spaced repetition was supposed to be a [[soft alarm clock]] that could gently push back items into the future, but if I can't deal with items when they show up for review, that is adding another "epicycle": I am wanting to hit snooze on the snooze itself.		When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? Spaced repetition was supposed to be a [[soft alarm clock]] that could gently push back items into the future, but if I can't deal with items when they show up for review, that is adding another "epicycle": I am wanting to hit snooze on the snooze itself.
		+
		+	The way to make this more interesting is to imagine that I had an item in my inbox that's already been there for a while. It comes up for review. If I hit "good", then it's going to next come back in 5 years. That feels like too much time! So I want to hit "snooze" on the review itself -- remind me about ''the fact that this item is due for review'' in, say, a week.

	==See also==		==See also==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 29 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? ~~i feel like~~ the ~~"rules of the game" haven~~'t ~~been established yet so it~~ is ~~hard to say what~~ I ~~should do ... i.e. idk how~~ to ~~convert my mental motions (like flinch, or excitement, or tiredness) into a piece or parameter of the algorithm for~~ the ~~scheduling algorithm~~.	+	When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? Spaced repetition was supposed to be a [[soft alarm clock]] that could gently push back items into the future, but if I can't deal with items when they show up for review, that is adding another "epicycle": I am wanting to hit snooze on the snooze itself.

	==See also==		==See also==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 29 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? i feel like the "rules of the game" haven't been established yet so it is hard to say what I should do ... i.e. idk how to convert my mental motions (like flinch, or excitement, or tiredness) into a piece or parameter of the algorithm for the scheduling algorithm.		When reviewing in my [[spaced writing inbox]], sometimes i am like, "oh i would deal with this item if i had more energy, but not right now". should i just press "good"? or is that where "again" is useful? i feel like the "rules of the game" haven't been established yet so it is hard to say what I should do ... i.e. idk how to convert my mental motions (like flinch, or excitement, or tiredness) into a piece or parameter of the algorithm for the scheduling algorithm.
		+
		+	==See also==
		+
		+	* [[Mapping mental motions to parts of a spaced repetition algorithm]]

	[[Category:Spaced repetition]]		[[Category:Spaced repetition]]