Discontinuities in usefulness of whole brain emulation technology - Revision history

Issa at 09:49, 6 May 2020

2020-05-06T09:49:51Z

Issa at 06:42, 6 May 2020

2020-05-06T06:42:01Z

Issa: Issa moved page Discontinuities in whole brain emulation technology to Discontinuities in usefulness of whole brain emulation technology

2020-05-06T05:45:25Z

Issa moved page Discontinuities in whole brain emulation technology to Discontinuities in usefulness of whole brain emulation technology

Issa at 05:40, 6 May 2020

2020-05-06T05:40:44Z

Issa: Created page with "Even Robin Hanson admits that whole brain emulations would result in a foom-ish/local outcome: """Eliezer: Right. So, in other words, we get a centralized economic shock,..."

2020-05-06T05:39:42Z

Created page with "Even Robin Hanson admits that whole brain emulations would result in a foom-ish/local outcome: """Eliezer: Right. So, in other words, we get a centralized economic shock,..."

New page

Even [[Robin Hanson]] admits that whole brain emulations would result in a foom-ish/local outcome:

"""Eliezer: Right. So, in other words, we get a centralized economic shock, because there's a curve here that has a little step function in it. If I can step back and describe what you're describing on a higher level of abstraction, you have emulation technology that is being developed all over the world, but there's this very sharp threshold in how well the resulting emulation runs as a function of how good your emulation technology is. The output of the emulation experiences a sharp threshold.

Robin: Exactly."""<ref>https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk</ref>

==References==

<references/>

[[Category:AI safety]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 6 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Even [[Robin Hanson]] admits that whole brain ~~emulations~~ would result in a foom-ish/local outcome:	+	Even [[Robin Hanson]] admits that [[whole brain emulation]]s would result in a foom-ish/local outcome:

	"""Eliezer: Right. So, in other words, we get a centralized economic shock, because there's a curve here that has a little step function in it. If I can step back and describe what you're describing on a higher level of abstraction, you have emulation technology that is being developed all over the world, but there's this very sharp threshold in how well the resulting emulation runs as a function of how good your emulation technology is. The output of the emulation experiences a sharp threshold.		"""Eliezer: Right. So, in other words, we get a centralized economic shock, because there's a curve here that has a little step function in it. If I can step back and describe what you're describing on a higher level of abstraction, you have emulation technology that is being developed all over the world, but there's this very sharp threshold in how well the resulting emulation runs as a function of how good your emulation technology is. The output of the emulation experiences a sharp threshold.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 6 May 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Robin: Exactly."""<ref>https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk</ref>		Robin: Exactly."""<ref>https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk</ref>
		+
		+	Now I'm curious if [[Paul]] would also take this position wrt WBE. because it seems like the general argument of "before someone makes a good version of a thing, they make a crappy version of it" would also apply to WBE?

	==See also==		==See also==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:40, 6 May 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Robin: Exactly."""<ref>https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk</ref>		Robin: Exactly."""<ref>https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=17yLL7B7yRrhV3J9NuiVuac3hNmjeKTVHnqiEa6UQpJk</ref>
		+
		+	==See also==
		+
		+	* [[Counterfactual of dropping a seed AI into a world without other capable AI]]

	==References==		==References==

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:45, 6 May 2020
(No difference)