Booster card - Revision history

Issa at 00:57, 17 July 2021

2021-07-17T00:57:00Z

Issa at 02:05, 30 March 2021

2021-03-30T02:05:35Z

Issa at 16:39, 28 March 2021

2021-03-28T16:39:48Z

Issa at 20:52, 26 March 2021

2021-03-26T20:52:30Z

Issa at 20:50, 26 March 2021

2021-03-26T20:50:55Z

Issa at 20:49, 26 March 2021

2021-03-26T20:49:38Z

Issa: Created page with " I think that something like Quantum Country would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the..."

2021-03-26T20:44:59Z

Created page with " I think that something like Quantum Country would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the..."

New page

I think that something like [[Quantum Country]] would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the original article. It would cover cards that are less essential but still solidify your understanding -- the stuff in the original article that would have "fallen through the cracks" if you just did the given prompts without re-reading the article. These additional facts might be annoying to collect on a first pass, as you are still trying to make sense of the "main thread" of the article, but become important over time. This might be one escape from [[Feeling like a perpetual student in a subject due to spaced repetition]], and [[Andy Matuschak]]'s [https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7MWDLQ7ni6kp4ziDawQG1xYC9Um741WsUQ4h Efficient review scheduling is in tension with gated course sequences].

[[Category:Spaced repetition]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 17 July 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:

	[[Should booster cards be marked as new?]]		[[Should booster cards be marked as new?]]
		+
		+	==What links here==
		+
		+	{{Special:WhatLinksHere/{{FULLPAGENAME}} \| hideredirects=1}}

	[[Category:Spaced repetition]]		[[Category:Spaced repetition]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 30 March 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[[Optimal unlocking mechanism for booster cards is unclear]].		[[Optimal unlocking mechanism for booster cards is unclear]].
		+
		+	[[Should booster cards be marked as new?]]

	[[Category:Spaced repetition]]		[[Category:Spaced repetition]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 28 March 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Booster cards can also work nicely when a piece of knowledge has multiple prerequisites. For example with [[Tao Analysis Flashcards]], when the successor operation ++ is introduced in Section 2.1, the reader does not yet have the vocabulary to state that ++ is an injective function (even though this is fact is already implicit in the Peano axioms). Once functions and injectivity are introduced in Chapter 3, Tao does not go out of his way to highlight that ++ is an injective function. But a booster card could be added that reinforces the old knowledge given this new vocabulary.		Booster cards can also work nicely when a piece of knowledge has multiple prerequisites. For example with [[Tao Analysis Flashcards]], when the successor operation ++ is introduced in Section 2.1, the reader does not yet have the vocabulary to state that ++ is an injective function (even though this is fact is already implicit in the Peano axioms). Once functions and injectivity are introduced in Chapter 3, Tao does not go out of his way to highlight that ++ is an injective function. But a booster card could be added that reinforces the old knowledge given this new vocabulary.
		+
		+	[[Optimal unlocking mechanism for booster cards is unclear]].

	[[Category:Spaced repetition]]		[[Category:Spaced repetition]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 26 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In the context of [[card sharing]], a '''booster card''' is a card that is not introduced ~~at the same time~~ the original lesson is ~~taught~~.	+	In the context of [[card sharing]], a '''booster card''' is a card that is not introduced during the original lesson, but is rather introduced much later.

	I think that something like [[Quantum Country]] would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the original article. It would cover cards that are less essential but still solidify your understanding -- the stuff in the original article that would have "fallen through the cracks" if you just did the given prompts without re-reading the article. These additional facts might be annoying to collect on a first pass, as you are still trying to make sense of the "main thread" of the article, but become important over time. This might be one escape from [[Feeling like a perpetual student in a subject due to spaced repetition]], and [[Andy Matuschak]]'s [https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7MWDLQ7ni6kp4ziDawQG1xYC9Um741WsUQ4h Efficient review scheduling is in tension with gated course sequences].		I think that something like [[Quantum Country]] would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the original article. It would cover cards that are less essential but still solidify your understanding -- the stuff in the original article that would have "fallen through the cracks" if you just did the given prompts without re-reading the article. These additional facts might be annoying to collect on a first pass, as you are still trying to make sense of the "main thread" of the article, but become important over time. This might be one escape from [[Feeling like a perpetual student in a subject due to spaced repetition]], and [[Andy Matuschak]]'s [https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7MWDLQ7ni6kp4ziDawQG1xYC9Um741WsUQ4h Efficient review scheduling is in tension with gated course sequences].

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 26 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−		+	In the context of [[card sharing]], a '''booster card''' is a card that is not introduced at the same time the original lesson is taught.
−

	I think that something like [[Quantum Country]] would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the original article. It would cover cards that are less essential but still solidify your understanding -- the stuff in the original article that would have "fallen through the cracks" if you just did the given prompts without re-reading the article. These additional facts might be annoying to collect on a first pass, as you are still trying to make sense of the "main thread" of the article, but become important over time. This might be one escape from [[Feeling like a perpetual student in a subject due to spaced repetition]], and [[Andy Matuschak]]'s [https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7MWDLQ7ni6kp4ziDawQG1xYC9Um741WsUQ4h Efficient review scheduling is in tension with gated course sequences].		I think that something like [[Quantum Country]] would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the original article. It would cover cards that are less essential but still solidify your understanding -- the stuff in the original article that would have "fallen through the cracks" if you just did the given prompts without re-reading the article. These additional facts might be annoying to collect on a first pass, as you are still trying to make sense of the "main thread" of the article, but become important over time. This might be one escape from [[Feeling like a perpetual student in a subject due to spaced repetition]], and [[Andy Matuschak]]'s [https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7MWDLQ7ni6kp4ziDawQG1xYC9Um741WsUQ4h Efficient review scheduling is in tension with gated course sequences].

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 26 March 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I think that something like [[Quantum Country]] would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the original article. It would cover cards that are less essential but still solidify your understanding -- the stuff in the original article that would have "fallen through the cracks" if you just did the given prompts without re-reading the article. These additional facts might be annoying to collect on a first pass, as you are still trying to make sense of the "main thread" of the article, but become important over time. This might be one escape from [[Feeling like a perpetual student in a subject due to spaced repetition]], and [[Andy Matuschak]]'s [https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7MWDLQ7ni6kp4ziDawQG1xYC9Um741WsUQ4h Efficient review scheduling is in tension with gated course sequences].		I think that something like [[Quantum Country]] would benefit from having additional cards that you can collect by reading a separate page a month or so after you read the original article. It would cover cards that are less essential but still solidify your understanding -- the stuff in the original article that would have "fallen through the cracks" if you just did the given prompts without re-reading the article. These additional facts might be annoying to collect on a first pass, as you are still trying to make sense of the "main thread" of the article, but become important over time. This might be one escape from [[Feeling like a perpetual student in a subject due to spaced repetition]], and [[Andy Matuschak]]'s [https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7MWDLQ7ni6kp4ziDawQG1xYC9Um741WsUQ4h Efficient review scheduling is in tension with gated course sequences].
		+
		+	Booster cards can also work nicely when a piece of knowledge has multiple prerequisites. For example with [[Tao Analysis Flashcards]], when the successor operation ++ is introduced in Section 2.1, the reader does not yet have the vocabulary to state that ++ is an injective function (even though this is fact is already implicit in the Peano axioms). Once functions and injectivity are introduced in Chapter 3, Tao does not go out of his way to highlight that ++ is an injective function. But a booster card could be added that reinforces the old knowledge given this new vocabulary.

	[[Category:Spaced repetition]]		[[Category:Spaced repetition]]